Sep 30, 2014
1,605 notes

fashion-runways:

BASIL SODA Haute Couture Fall/Winter 2011/2012

(via zohbugg)

Sep 30, 2014
42,472 notes

(Source: trashmisfit, via presque-jamais)

Sep 30, 2014
1,684 notes
Sep 30, 2014
3,017 notes
weirdvintage:

Lady Florence Norman, a suffragette, rides her motor-scooter to work, 1916 (via)

weirdvintage:

Lady Florence Norman, a suffragette, rides her motor-scooter to work, 1916 (via)

(via weirdvintage)

Sep 30, 2014
39,204 notes
dogweeds:

a tribute

dogweeds:

a tribute

(via zohbugg)

Sep 30, 2014
180,372 notes

amaeza:

untruc:

amaeza:

you know, i’m a raging lesbian and i was never distracted by what other girls in my classes were wearing in high school. this is a male problem, not an “attracted to women” problem.

This is an “inability to respect women” problem.

Which is a male problem.

(Source: deteitte, via presque-jamais)

Sep 30, 2014
31,399 notes
thefrogman:

Doodle Time by Sarah Anderson [tumblr | twitter | facebook]

thefrogman:

Doodle Time by Sarah Anderson [tumblr | twitter | facebook]

(Source: sarahseeandersen)

Sep 30, 2014
11,820 notes

Oldest depiction of female form shows that modern archaeologists are pornsick misogynists : Reclusive Leftist

zohbugg:

cannelledusoleil:

female-only:

plansfornigel:

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Female figurine from the Hohle Fels cave near Stuttgart, about 35,000 years old. Interpreted as a pornographic pin-up.

“The Earliest Pornography” says Science Now, describing the 35,000 year old ivory figurine that’s been dug up in a cave near Stuttgart. The tiny statuette is of a female with exaggerated breasts and vulva. According to Paul Mellars, one of the archaeologist twits who commented on the find for Nature, this makes the figurine “pornographic.” Nature is even titling its article, “Prehistoric Pin Up.” It’s the Venus of Willendorf double standard all over again. Ancient figures of naked pregnant women are interpreted by smirking male archaeologists as pornography, while equally sexualized images of men are assumed to depict gods or shamans. Or even hunters or warriors. Funny, huh?

Consider: phallic images from the Paleolithic are at least 28,000 years old. Neolithic cultures all over the world seemed to have a thing for sculptures with enormous erect phalluses. Ancient civilizations were awash in images of male genitalia, from the Indian lingam to the Egyptian benben to the Greek herm. The Romans even painted phalluses on their doors and wore phallic charms around their necks.

Image and video hosting by TinyPicIthyphallic figure from Lascaux, about 17,000 years old. Interpreted as a shaman.

But nobody ever interprets this ancient phallic imagery as pornography. Instead, it’s understood to indicate reverence for male sexual potency. No one, for example, has ever suggested that the Lascaux cave dude was a pin-up; he’s assumed to be a shaman. The ithyphallic figurines from the Neolithic — and there are many — are interpreted as gods. And everyone knows that the phalluses of ancient India and Egypt and Greece and Rome represented awesome divine powers of fertility and protection. Yet an ancient figurine of a nude woman — a life-giving woman, with her vulva ready to bring forth a new human being, and her milk-filled breasts ready to nourish that being — is interpreted as pornography. Just something for a man to whack off to. It’s not as if there’s no other context in which to interpret the figure. After all, the European Paleolithic is chock full of pregnant-looking female statuettes that are quite similar to this one. By the time we get to the Neolithic, the naked pregnant female is enthroned with lions at her feet, and it’s clear that people are worshipping some kind of female god.

Yet in the Science Now article, the archaeologist who found the figurine is talking about pornographic pin-ups: “I showed it to a male colleague, and his response was, ‘Nothing’s changed in 40,000 years.’” That sentence needs to be bronzed and hung up on a plaque somewhere, because you couldn’t ask for a better demonstration of the classic fallacy of reading the present into the past. The archaeologist assumes the artist who created the figurine was male; why? He assumes the motive was lust; why? Because that’s all he knows. To his mind, the image of a naked woman with big breasts and exposed vulva can only mean one thing: porn! Porn made by men, for men! And so he assumes, without questioning his assumptions, that the image must have meant the same thing 35,000 years ago. No other mental categories for “naked woman” are available to him. His mind is a closed box. This has been the central flaw of anthropology for as long there’s been anthropology. And even before: the English invaders of North America thought the Iroquois chiefs had concubines who accompanied them everywhere, because they had no other mental categories to account for well-dressed, important-looking women sitting in a council house. It’s the same fallacy that bedevils archaeologists who dig up male skeletons with fancy beads and conclude that the society was male dominant (because powerful people wear jewelry!), and at another site dig up female skeletons with fancy beads and conclude that this society, too, was male dominant (because women have to dress up as sex objects and trophy wives!). Male dominance is all they can imagine. And so no matter what they dig up, they interpret it to fit their mental model. It’s the fallacy that also drives evolutionary psychology, the central premise of which is that human beings in the African Pleistocene had exactly the same values, beliefs, prejudices, power struggles, goals, and needs as the middle-class white professors and students in a graduate psychology lab in modern-day Santa Barbara, California. And that these same factors are universal and unchanged and true for all time.

Image and video hosting by TinyPicHohle Fels phallus, about 28,000 years old. Interpreted as a symbolic object and …flint knapper. Yes.

That’s not science; it’s circular, self-serving propaganda. This little figurine from Hohle Fels, for example, is going to be used as “proof” that pornography is ancient and natural. I guarantee it. Having been interpreted by pornsick male archaeologists as pornography because that’s all they know, the statuette will now be trotted out by every ev psycho and male supremacist on the planet as “proof” that pornography is eternal, that male dominance is how it’s supposed to be, and that feminists are crazy so shut the fuck up. Look for it in Steven Pinker’s next book. ***

P.S. My own completely speculative guess on the figurine is that it might be connected to childbirth rituals. Notice the engraved marks and slashes; that’s a motif that continues for thousands of years on these little female figurines. No one knows what they mean, but they meant something. They’re not just random cut marks. Someone put a great deal of work into this sculpture. Given that childbirth was incredibly risky for Paleolithic women, they must have prayed their hearts out for help and protection in that time. I can imagine an elder female shaman or artist carving this potent little figure, and propping it up somewhere as a focus for those prayers.

On the other hand, it is possible that it has nothing to do with childbearing or sexual behavior at all. The breasts and vulva may simply indicate who the figure is: the female god. Think of how Christ is always depicted with a beard, which is a male sexual characteristic, even though Christ isn’t about male sexuality. The beard is just a marker. Or, given the figurine’s exaggerated breasts, it may have something to do with sustenance: milk, food, nourishment.

The notion that some dude carved this thing to whack off to — when he was surrounded by women who probably weren’t wearing much in the way of clothes anyway — is laughable.

Good lord I am so glad I took ancient art from a female professor.

Flint knapper?? SERIOUSLY?

Sep 30, 2014
606 notes

acalmstrength42:

**************************************************

Hermione Granger-inspired knitting roundup!!!

**************************************************

Of Hallows and Horcruxes Sweater  - This sweater is inspired by the sweater worn by Hermione Granger in “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1” during several of the scenes set in the forest.

Hermione’s Scarf - The Fair Isle scarf worn by Hermione in the Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince movie.

Elan Mitts  -  Knit in a similar style to Hermione’s fingerless mitts in The Deathly Hallows.

Godric’s Hollow Hat  -  A hat inspired by the one Hermione is wearing in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

Hermione Hearts Ron Hat  -  This sweet little hat was inspired by the movie based on the book Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince. 

Hermione’s Everyday Socks  -  Hermione, as described in J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter Series, is a rather smart and practical heroine. While she can dress up with the best of them, these socks remind me of something she might wear while practicing charms or transfiguration or reading up on Arithromancy in the Gryffindor Common Room.

Hermione’s Time Turner Mitts  -  Hermione applies her knitting skills in her attempts to liberate the Hogwarts house-elves in Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (Scholastic, 2003), but before she embarked on charity knitting, she may have tried her hand at a few functional garments for herself, such as these mitts. With a Time-Turner in her possession, she could have found the extra time that every knitter craves to finish projects. Maybe she carried her entire knitting library around with her in her bag with the Undetectable Extension Charm? “Accio Knitter’s Companion!”

Mudblood Cardigan  -  Hermione Granger was the inspiration for this design. She may be Muggle-born, but she’s also the cleverest witch her age. Her cleverness and strength make her a favorite. The Mudblood Cardigan is inspired by her fitted, simply lined, girl-next-door style, a look that is perfect for doing battle against the Dark Arts.

(via marchingjaybird)

Sep 30, 2014
3,653 notes

(Source: simplici-tea, via hollyday-s)

Sep 30, 2014
43,728 notes

incompleteicarus:

Do you ever ‘wtf white people’ even though you are a white people.

(via marchingjaybird)

Sep 30, 2014
872 notes
Sep 29, 2014
133,064 notes

bemusedlybespectacled:

liamgalgey:

Mike Wazowski joins the Avengers.

THOR’S HAMMER IS BLOCKING HIS FACE I AM DYING

(via pleatedjeans)

Sep 29, 2014
5,599 notes
pleatedjeans:

Yay adulthood! [x]

pleatedjeans:

Yay adulthood! [x]

Sep 29, 2014
607 notes

Queen Margherita of Italy, Detail.
by Pasquale di Criscito. 1878

Queen Margherita of Italy, Detail.

by Pasquale di Criscito. 1878

(Source: sadnessdollart, via cajunmama)

Navigate
« To the past Page 1 of 921
About
And other lovely little tidbits. Subscribe via RSS.